Are there interest groups in russia

International Affairs 72 3 : — Mansfield, E. Foreign Affairs 74 3 : 79— Markwick, R. Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics 13 3 : — Medvedev, D. Minchenko, Y. Mitrokhin, N. Moskva: Novoje literaturnoje obozrenie. In: Ermann I. Istoricheskoje znanije v sovremennoj Rossii: diskussii i poiski novykh podhodov. Moskva: Rossiiskij Gosudarstvennij Universitet, pp.

INDEks, no. Moskovskij tserkovnij vestnik. Obshestvenniye organizatsii. Opredelenie Osvjashennogo Arkhiereiskogo sobora. Putin, V. Annual state of the nation address to parliament. Rieber, A. In: H. Ragsdale ed. Imperial Russian Foreign Policy. Rubinstein, A. Imperial and Global. New York: Scott, Foresman. Sakwa, R. In: Power and Politics in Putin's Russia. London: Routledge. Shevtsova, L. Washington: The Carnegie Endowment for Peace.

Washington: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. Shlapentokh, V. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Book Google Scholar. Soldatov, A.

New York: PublicAffairs. Tarn, R. International Journal ; In: R. Goldwin ed. Readings in Russian Foreign Policy. Trenin, D. Project Syndicate. Moscow, www. Timofeev, L. Moskva: Rossiiskij Gosudarstevennij Gumanitarnij Universitet. Organizations targeted include groups that work on human rights, the environment, LGBT issues, and health issues, groups that do polling about social issues.

Two years of mounting pressure by the authorities, court proceedings, and massive fines did not succeed in forcing groups to voluntarily register as foreign agents. Your tax deductible gift can help stop human rights violations and save lives around the world.

More Reading. November 12, Dispatches. November 12, Statement. November 3, Report. December 10, Report. It gave a possibility to organize meetings between the European Commission, Russian energy corporations, state officials, diplomats and experts from both sides.

The same refers to professional organizations. But these also usually relate to energy interests. Russian lobbying in the EU heavily relies on top-down approach, individual ties between the major decision makers. At the same time it has a relatively poor communication with the key policy making centers, experts and the public opinion. Russian tactics of influence comprises of narrow short-term interests and is aimed at generating a more favorable environment for its big businesses.

There are several reasons why current mechanism has only limited influence on European policy making. A top-down approach depends on high-profile decision makers who are ready to be mediators between different sides.

To some extent, Russia still has sympathizers, but there are much fewer of those who represent mainstream centrist politics; many derive from non-systemic, often populist forces. A decisive factor of Russian weak lobbying capabilities in Europe relates to inability to build strong coalition networks, including NGOs and the media.

Decisions made in the EU depend not only on resources, but also on public interests. Public policy can be a dangerous water for many interest groups, because it involves the public opinion and those who formulate it — politicians, media, NGOs, civic leaders etc. While Russia may be strong in maintaining narrow corporate and governmental interests, it has much less impact on public policies.

One of the biggest weaknesses of Russian attitude towards Europe, especially for the last decade, was to consider the government as the leading actors in bilateral and multilateral ties. Spread of allied Government-organized non-governmental organizations GONGOs that translated governmental position into policy making areas, was a continuation of top-down approach.