Qualitative research how many participants

Health Educ Behav. Saunders MN, Townsend K. Reporting and justifying the number of interview participants in organization and workplace research. Br J Manag. Sobal J. Sample extensiveness in qualitative nutrition education research. J Nutr Educ. Thomson SB. Sample size and grounded theory. Baker SE, Edwards R. How many qualitative interviews is enough? Ogden J, Cornwell D. The role of topic, interviewee, and question in predicting rich interview data in the field of health research.

Sociol Health Illn. Green J, Thorogood N. Qualitative methods for health research. Designing and selecting samples. In: Ritchie J, Lewis J, editors. Qualitative research practice: a guide for social science students and researchers. Britten N. Qualitative research: qualitative interviews in medical research.

Creswell JW. Qualitative inquiry and research design: choosing among five approaches. Supporting thinking on sample sizes for thematic analyses: a quantitative tool. Int J Soc Res Methodol. Emmel N. Themes, variables, and the limits to calculating sample size in qualitative research: a response to Fugard and Potts. Braun V, Clarke V. Hammersley M. Sampling and thematic analysis: a response to Fugard and Potts. Charmaz K. Constructing grounded theory: a practical guide through qualitative analysis.

Bowen GA. Naturalistic inquiry and the saturation concept: a research note. Data were saturated. A conversation with max van Manen on phenomenology in its original sense. Nurs Health Sci. Dey I. Grounding grounded theory. J Couns Dev. PLoS Med ; 6 7 : e Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Boyatzis RE. Transforming qualitative information: thematic analysis and code development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; Recommendations for designing and reviewing qualitative research in psychology: promoting methodological integrity.

Qual Psychol. Morrow SL. Quality and trustworthiness in qualitative research in counseling psychology. J Couns Psychol. Barroso J, Sandelowski M. Sample reporting in qualitative studies of women with HIV infection. Implement Sci. Onwuegbuzie AJ. Leech NL. A call for qualitative power analyses. Real qualitative researchers do not count: the use of numbers in qualitative research. Erickson F. Qualitative methods in research on teaching. In: Wittrock M, editor. Handbook of research on teaching.

New York: Macmillan; How theory is used and articulated in qualitative research: development of a new typology. Soc Sci Med. An open letter to the BMJ editors on qualitative research. Download references. We would like to thank Dr. Paula Smith and Katharine Lee for their comments on a previous draft of this paper as well as Natalie Ann Mitchell and Meron Teferra for assisting us with data extraction. The research continued and was completed independent of any support.

The funding body did not have any role in the study design, the collection, analysis and interpretation of the data, in the writing of the paper, and in the decision to submit the manuscript for publication. The views expressed are those of the authors alone. Supporting data can be accessed in the original publications. Additional File 2 lists all eligible studies that were included in the present analysis. You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar.

Correspondence to Konstantina Vasileiou. Terry Young is an academic who undertakes research and occasional consultancy in the areas of health technology assessment, information systems, and service design. He is unaware of any direct conflict of interest with respect to this paper. All other authors have no competing interests to declare. Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Editorial positions on qualitative research and sample considerations where available. DOCX 12 kb. Reprints and Permissions. Vasileiou, K. Characterising and justifying sample size sufficiency in interview-based studies: systematic analysis of qualitative health research over a year period.

Download citation. Received : 22 May Accepted : 29 October Published : 21 November Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:. Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article. Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative.

Skip to main content. Search all BMC articles Search. Download PDF. Research article Open Access Published: 21 November Characterising and justifying sample size sufficiency in interview-based studies: systematic analysis of qualitative health research over a year period Konstantina Vasileiou ORCID: orcid. Abstract Background Choosing a suitable sample size in qualitative research is an area of conceptual debate and practical uncertainty.

Methods A systematic analysis of single-interview-per-participant designs within three health-related journals from the disciplines of psychology, sociology and medicine, over a year period, was conducted to examine whether and how sample sizes were justified and how sample size was characterised and discussed by authors.

Results Our findings demonstrate that provision of sample size justifications in qualitative health research is limited; is not contingent on the number of interviews; and relates to the journal of publication.

Conclusions We recommend, firstly, that qualitative health researchers be more transparent about evaluations of their sample size sufficiency, situating these within broader and more encompassing assessments of data adequacy. Background Sample adequacy in qualitative inquiry pertains to the appropriateness of the sample composition and size. Objectives of the present study The present study sought to enrich existing systematic analyses of the customs and practices of sample size reporting and justification by focusing on qualitative research relating to health.

Methods Study design A structured search for articles reporting cross-sectional, interview-based qualitative studies was carried out and eligible reports were systematically reviewed and analysed employing both quantitative and qualitative analytic techniques.

Eligibility criteria To be eligible for inclusion in the review, the article had to report a cross-sectional study design. Full size image. Table 1 Descriptive statistics of the sample sizes of eligible articles across the three journals Full size table.

Table 3 Commonality, type and counts of sample size justifications across journals Full size table. Discussion The present study sought to examine how qualitative sample sizes in health-related research are characterised and justified.

Conclusions The past decade has seen a growing appetite in qualitative research for an evidence-based approach to sample size determination and to evaluations of the sufficiency of sample size. Notes 1. References 1. Google Scholar 3. This also affects… Participant access: Remote qualitative research can be a lifesaver when it comes to participant access. Quality: On the other hand, remote research does have its downsides.

Is there value in outsourcing recruitment? Recommended for you. Note-taking: The best tool to get stakeholders onside with your next research project Getting stakeholders aligned and engaged with your research is rarely easy. Monthly UX insights, delivered to your inbox Subscribe to our newsletter. Try Optimal Workshop tools for free Get started.

What are you looking for? That is something that you could estimate separately for your population by running a pilot study.

Of course, a pilot study to estimate the standard deviation is quite expensive and it will itself involve a fairly large number of participants.

On the other hand, in most quantitative usability studies, there are several metrics involved and usually at least one of them is binary. Therefore, we recommend using that binary metric as a constraint in deciding the number of users. That will usually result in good margins of error for the other metrics involved.

If, however, you collect only continuous metrics this is unusual and you cannot afford to estimate the standard deviation of your population, you must first settle on a desired value for your margin of error. Of course, your desired value will depend on what you are measuring and the range for a task.

In other words, if the mean task time is 1 min, your estimated standard deviation is 0. If the mean task time is 10 minutes, then your estimated standard deviation will be 0. This table shows the required number of participants needed for a study involving continuous metrics such as time on task or satisfaction. Different numbers of participants are appropriate for different confidence levels and desired margins of error.

Even though there are many different recommendations for sample sizes in quantitative usability testing, they are all consistent with each other — they simply make slightly different assumptions. We think the user guideline is the simplest and the most likely to lead to good results — namely, a relatively small margin of error with a high confidence level. Moreover, if you also have tolerance for a larger margin of error, you can drop the number of users to 20 or even fewer, but that is generally a lot riskier.

An acceptable strategy especially if you are on a tight budget and mostly interested in continuous metrics such as task time and satisfaction is to start with as many users as you can comfortably afford — say, 20—25 [RB3] users. If they are too wide, then consider adding more users. Otherwise, you risk compromising the validity of your study. To learn how to correctly analyze and interpret your quantitative data, check out our full-day seminar, How to Interpret UX Numbers: Statistics for UX.

Jeff Sauro, James Lewis. Raluca Budiu is Director of Research at Nielsen Norman Group, where she consults for clients from a variety of industries and presents tutorials on mobile usability, designing interfaces for multiple devices, quantitative usability methods, cognitive psychology for designers, and principles of human-computer interaction.

Because the type of members in a panel must fit a certain mold, panel quality is far more important than general sampling with broad parameters. Therefore, our first step is to recruit respondents who fit our audience specifications. Choice of sample size is often affected by the type of qualitative study chosen to complete market research. Some of the commonly employed methods in this type of research are in-depth interviews , focus groups , and ethnographic research , and the types of questions being asked are just as important as the size of the sample used.

In all of these study designs, an important principle to keep in mind is that of saturation. In qualitative research , in comparison to quantitative research , the goal is to reduce estimation error. When a researcher is approaching saturation, the collection of additional data does not provide further insight into the topic of investigation.