Why is building on greenfield sites unsustainable

Recommended Related Articles Countryside lost to housing, despite increase in brownfield development The Brownfield Revolution: Could be the tipping point for brownfield sites? Brownfield development vs. New gov data shows increase of green belt land released for housing Government has broken its promise to secure the green belt, says CPRE Supporting the protection of the green belt in the UK.

Call for mandatory licensing to ban cowboy builders. One in 10 construction workers suffer poor mental health. How will the Autumn Budget impact the construction industry? Counting carbon for a more sustainable future. M-AR — a solutions based, leading offsite contractor. Please enter your comment! Please enter your name here. You have entered an incorrect email address!

This makes development on greenfields cost effective. It can encourage more sustainable lifestyles by providing an opportunity to recycle land, clean up contaminated sites, and assist environmental, social and economic regeneration. It also reduces pressure to build on greenfield land and helps protect the countryside. Brownfield sites The site has already been developed so reduces urban sprawl. Use unsightly areas for building developments, so improves the urban environment.

Are found in urban areas, so building housing there reduces demand on car use. The advantages of greenfield investments include increased investor control relative to investing in an existing local business, as well as the opportunity to form marketing partnerships and avoid intermediary costs. And the simple answer is — yes! So if you live in North London, your PD rights are still applicable.

Effects Upon Greenfield Sites of Development Once land has been converted to development, it is unlikely to ever be converted back to Greenfield use Destruction of the natural habitat of some animal and plant species Loss of agricultural land results in loss of production and loss of employment Reduction of or complete loss of amenity or recreation value Negative effect upon transport and energy use Loss of the green belt of agricultural or designated wildlife land, that clearly defines and separates areas of difference, be they cities, towns, suburbs, villages or hamlets of housing This is a package of negative effects upon the Greenfield site and potentially the surrounding areas, if the site is used for building development.

Now the Government, led by economic planning and forecasts, are saying that the use of brownfield sites for development will not be enough, and more land is needed. Campaigners argue that the Government in announcing this plan, had not stuck to their initial promises, and had in fact passed over potential brownfield sites, and that further development up the M11 toward Cambridgeshire and Milton Keynes, also mentioned in the Government plan, would have no choice but to use greenfield land.

Creating satellite towns from one large or capital city urban conurbation diminishes local cultural identity, without safeguarding employment, or rural safety, or community values. A Sustainable Future There are many examples of small-scale development use of Greenfield sites. These might for instance take part of a piece of agricultural land for construction, but on the other piece, enhance its agricultural status, by converting it for organic agriculture, or small-scale farming, or for the production of plants to convert to bio-fuel, or for the creation of a wildlife habitat, that did not already exist.

There are Greenfield sites that are not being used for any purpose, for whatever reason. Development must consider all human and environmental factors, not just consume land and space for short-term solutions. A sustainable vision would look at all the options for land use, human population expansion, urban sprawl, economic considerations as well as environmental needs.

I have a question to help in relation to a land dispute in my area. The area has a no greenfield building policy, however this land used to house a mill which was demolished in Since then it has become a woodland, completely taken back by nature. Someone with a claim to the land under dispute is attempting to completely fell the land and build on it as brownfield land.

So my question is, is there any legal guidelines as to when a site becomes greenfield land again legally? D Scarlett. We have our stables on the land the land is for our own use only for the last 16 years. Durham cc planning dept have told me it is now green field land ,we would like a house here and have been in contact with a company that builds timber framed lodges under the caravan rules do you think pp would be granted?

The easiest way to get an idea about this would be to talk to your local planning officer. Give them an idea what the building would be like, how temporary or permanent it would be and where it would be sited etc. There is a beautiful paddock to the rear of our house that backs on to open agricultural fields.

It is outside of the development boundary of the village. There has never been any buildings on there, though a developer wants to build a private access road and a house development of over sq metres for just one property which will not only dwarf the four houses nearby but destroy the beautiful views and habitat that we and the wildlife enjoy.

In the planning process the applicant who Is not a resident of the village has insisted on belittling the current residents in their responses via formal objection and has not consulted with any wildlife groups to assess the damage such a palatial build will cause.

On the application the applicant has insisted that this type of build is what the village needs and has planned to construct a refuse collection point which is right on the garden boundary space, convenient for the design but not for the children that play there. They have argued that in order for him to move his family into the village to integrate he must be granted the permission. There is sufficient existing housing stock here for them to buy and improve should they so wish?